of EU road deaths in 2023 were cyclists
European Commission road-user breakdown
SRNA is building a safety-aware navigation layer that helps cyclists and e-bike riders understand route context before attention is under pressure.
Start with one high-frequency rider problem. Prove usefulness in one disciplined city pilot. Expand through devices, data quality and mobility partners.
Arrival time and distance do not explain every demanding intersection, road segment or shift in riding context — and late information competes with the attention needed to ride.
European Commission road-user breakdown
Pedestrians, cyclists, powered two-wheelers and personal mobility devices
Road type, crossings, surface, traffic conditions and rider preferences may live in separate sources.
A useful signal delivered too late can become noise at the moment attention matters most.
Riders need to understand why a route is suggested and where the data is incomplete.
SRNA’s core hypothesis is that riders will value a route decision when it explains more than where to go and how long it takes.
The first prototype must prove that this additional context improves route confidence without increasing distraction.
The planned system connects route data, local context, rider preferences and compatible-device signals through one explainable decision loop.
Combine only available, permitted and sufficiently fresh signals.
→Recognize segments that deserve earlier preparation — not predict an accident.
→Use a glance, sound or compatible surface at the moment it can help.
→Use optional feedback to calibrate usefulness, timing and local coverage.
Architecture direction — not a claim that every data source, model or device integration is already operational.
A coherent journey matters more than a long feature list.
Balance time, comfort and route-context preferences.
Core directionSee why the context route differs from the fastest route.
Core directionGet a short signal before a demanding segment, not during it.
Planned capabilityUse a compatible watch, audio device, display or radar when validated.
Planned integrationExplore optional ride insights without hidden partner sharing.
Research directionPrototype job: validate one complete route-choice-to-guidance loop before expanding the capability set.
The initial product should solve a frequent urban route decision for a narrow cohort before it attempts to serve every mode, city and partner.
A cyclist or e-bike rider who knows the destination but still evaluates comfort, road context and demanding segments on everyday journeys.
Route choice through post-ride feedback
Coverage and operations that can be inspected
Only inputs that can be measured and explained
The opportunity is not a generic market headline. It is a growing operating environment in which route context can become more measurable and more useful.
First EU-wide Cycling Counts baseline, 2026
A starting point for comparable infrastructure data
Stronger planning and data expectations
The European Declaration on Cycling commits institutions to safer, more coherent networks and stronger cycling conditions.
Comparable infrastructure, use and safety baselines create a better foundation for local validation.
Connected devices and mobility systems create surfaces for guidance that does not depend on sustained phone attention.
Credibility starts by separating what can be shown today from what the next build and pilot must establish.
This is not a traction claim. Prototype, interview, pilot and commercial metrics will be added only when they are documented.
The first pilot is an evidence system: one cohort, one area, a limited signal set and pre-agreed decision criteria.
Choose the rider cohort, geography, route types, available signals and the decision the pilot must support.
Coverage · baseline · consentConnect route selection, a small number of contextual cues and optional feedback without adding unmeasurable features.
Reliability · timing · comprehensionMeasure usefulness and failure modes, then decide whether to refine, expand or stop each capability.
Repeat use · false/redundant cues · privacy impactPrevented incidents are not an appropriate first-pilot KPI; any future safety-impact claim requires a larger, expert-reviewed methodology.
SRNA should earn its first users through credible communities and design partners, not an unfocused global acquisition campaign.
Recruit a relevant cohort through local cycling and e-bike groups, clubs and everyday commuter networks.
Align geography, data access, evaluation and public-interest guardrails around one defined question.
Validate one purposeful integration and reach riders through an existing trusted surface.
Explore discovery where riders already choose, configure and maintain their mobility equipment.
The model is diversified by customer value — without selling rider attention or presenting untested prices as published plans.
A useful core experience with clearly separated advanced route, offline or connected capabilities.
Test willingness to pay and retentionLicensed experience, SDK or API components that bring context to an existing rider surface.
Prove integration value and support costTime-bounded evaluation, integration and aggregated insight work with an explicit public-interest question.
Prove contract value and repeatabilityNo targeted-advertising model. Insurance remains a future, consent-based research direction — not a promised discount, score or active partnership.
A defensible market case will be built from tested conversion, pricing and partner values. Until then, the formula is more honest than a fabricated TAM.
Round diligence will contain the live assumption model; this public deck deliberately does not invent missing inputs.
The strategic position is a job-to-be-done, not an unsupported all-green comparison table.
Local quality, evaluation discipline and integrations may compound into an advantage — but only after the pilot proves that the loop is useful and responsible.
Track provenance, freshness, gaps and permissions.
Turn inputs into explainable route differences and cue timing.
Prioritize the smallest signal that can support awareness.
Use optional feedback to improve relevance and expose failure modes.
SRNA is currently a founder-led product and technical build. The next capabilities should be added against the validated prototype and pilot scope.
Product thesis and experience architecture
Technical website and prototype direction
Partner and validation framework
Routing, offline continuity, instrumentation and production-grade mobile delivery.
Source quality, context methodology, experiment design and signal calibration.
Cue timing, distraction, safety claims and expert-reviewed pilot design.
City operations, consent, legal readiness and partner delivery.
Founder biography, legal entity, formal titles and confirmed advisers belong in diligence once verified for public release; planned roles are not presented as current employees.
SRNA is opening conversations with investors and strategic pilot partners to fund the path from a focused prototype to an evidence-backed single-city pilot.
One coherent route-choice, cue and feedback journey with measurable instrumentation.
A documented route-context pipeline and one validated compatible-device integration.
A defined cohort, scorecard, privacy controls and transparent result review.
Retention, usefulness, feasibility and commercial-learning inputs for the next decision.